It can be correctly fine to jot down "that that" or to easily produce "that": your option, your type, your need in the intervening time.
three It seems odd to me that "used she to come back listed here?" is marked as official (old-fashioned and awkward I agree with). The "used to" construction registers with me as remaining basically informal. In a proper context I would count on "did she formerly appear listed here?" or Various other wordier phrase. (AmE speaker)
Now we test our nifty trick of dropping among the "that"s — "I don't Consider that problem is severe" —, and we instantly get a specific amount of people that parse the sentence as "[I don't Feel that] [problem is severe]" on their own to start with try out, and obtain terribly confused, and have to go back and check out a different parsing. (Is that a yard-route sentence still?)
2 Ben Lee illustrates two important points: "on" is yet another preposition for pinpointing location, and idiom trumps feeling, with sometimes-alternating in's and on's cascading at any time closer to your focal point.
"That that is true" gets "That which is true" or just, "The reality." I make this happen not because it is grammatically incorrect, but because it is more aesthetically pleasing. The overuse of your phrase "that" is actually a hallmark of lazy speech.
I was go st lucia rental boat not used to driving a large car or truck. (= Driving a huge motor vehicle was a whole new and difficult experience – I hadn't accomplished it before.)
What's this? Check "Recall Me" to accessibility your shopping cart on this Laptop although You're not signed in.
I am getting difficulties Googling a reference because of the "of", but it's a standard phrase - not lousy crafting in any way. Perhaps a little previous-fashioned. It might also imply "used by" - there is certainly an outdated hymn Used of God - but that's a different phrase.
if I might been at other locations that day and anticipated only being there for quite a while (especially if the opposite person knew this). Equally, I might say
Both of those the phrases imply that an action has become finished consistently; they don't seem to be used to make reference to actions that happened only once.
. The rules of English grammar would be the very reason why these types of "strange points" come about in the very first place. Now, whether or not you really finish up using a double "that" or rewording it, is usually a different question. But it is a question of fashion
If a "that" is omitted, It is the main a person that is removed. Replacing the second "that" with "it" could make clear matters:
To ensure effective communication, we inspire all inquiries and messages for being despatched through WhatsApp and email.
And generally suggests each and only both equally. Right after I want cake and pie, one wouldn't respond Oh, do you suggest you desire among cake or pie, but possibly not both equally? (unless you ended up endeavoring to discourage taking both equally, but that's not a scenario of ambiguity).